Let's take a step back look at this logically.
Gun's don't kill people, bullets do.
Without bullets a gun is just a fancy stick.
If
I have to provide my drivers license to get over the counter cold & sinus medication for my family to in order protect society from the possibility that this cold & sinus medication could potentially be used to convert Pseudoephedrine into methamphetamine;
Then
Why shouldn't people who buy bullets need to provide their drivers license to protect the society from being killed with bullets?
Forget the NRA. Stop arguing over the 2nd amendment and the right to bear arms. Stop talking about GUN control.
The US sells Pseudoephedrine only in pharmacies and Louisiana requires the purchaser to provide their Drivers License. This is done for a substance that can only cause harm in society if a rather arduous (and stinky) process is used to converted it to crystal meth.
So why not sell ammunition at registered locations (the equivalent of pharmacies) and require a Drivers License to buy the ammunition. All someone with a bullet has to do is put it in the gun; no processing required. And we know BULLETS KILL PEOPLE.
4 comments:
Bullets also protect people, Ive been broken into while my sister and I were sleeping and if I didnt have my firearm (Loaded with people killing bullets) the result of him running off with a hole in him couldve been very different.The safety of my family, neighbors and self are very important. The reason they ask for id when buying cold medicine is to stop the creation and distribution of meth. (two separate things that have nothing to do with each other)
Ammunition is an integral part of "bearing arms" which SCOTUS has ruled is an individual right of the people. There's no way around it; if you don't like the 2nd Amendment, repeal it. Good luck.
Yes, we all know how well providing ID for cold medicine has worked to to completely stop all forms of illegal meth production.
These blogs are quite incredible that have provided the best knowledge.
9mm Brass
Post a Comment